With one fell swoop councillors told they can kiss goodbye for now to prospect of 25 per cent pay rise
WITH one fell swoop the standards committee of Cambridgeshire County Council demolished the report that led to councillors awarding themselves a 25 per cent pay increase.
In a blistering assault that struck at the very heart of the council’s decision making core, the committee unanimously rejected the findings of an independent panel that had recommended the rises.
It was, unquestionably, one of the most inglorious of occasions Shire Hall, Cambridge, had witnessed.
Not even the wiles of Quentin Baker, director of legal services and monitoring officer, could rescue any remnant of respectability from a process the committee determined was flawed.
It means the �5,000 paid to Dr Declan Hall to chair the panel will be lost but this will more than be compensated for by the �165,000 a year saved by rejection of the report.
You may also want to watch:
Mr Baker was forced to tell councillors tonight by email that the committee
“concluded that the flaws in the process used were such that it was unable to ratify the appointments to the panel.”
- 1 Numerous Huntingdon High Street shops shut due to flooding
- 2 Shocks all round as police pull over 'white van man'
- 3 Man who burgled his own father’s home is sentenced
- 4 Seven men jailed for stealing bikes worth £70k
- 5 Father-of-five murdered due to 'drug deal dispute gone wrong'
- 6 Axe seized and two people charged for drink driving in St Ives
- 7 'Trolley waits' hit high for trust that oversees Hinchingbrooke Hospital
- 8 Man charged after knife found in St Neots police raid
- 9 Diners at St Ives pub help raise £8k for hospitality charity
- 10 WATCH: Flying Scotsman steams through Cambridgeshire Fens
He said: “As a consequence, the recent decision of full council, purporting to make a new scheme of members’ allowances, is defective as it was made without first having regard to the recommendations of an Independent Remuneration Panel.
“Arrangements will be made to commence a new process of review with a view to bringing recommendations, regarding members’ allowances, to a future meeting of full council at the earliest opportunity.”
County councillor Victor Lucas, a standards committee member, said: “The process ha got to be to seen to be seen to be whiter than white.
“I believe we are failing our community and that process has not been followed.”
Cllr Kevin Reynolds said: “We would be extremely unwise to go ahead and ratify the recommendation.”
Former Lib Dem councillor Clare Blair addressed the meeting to complain that the panel which recommended the review had been brought together improperly.
She felt the committee has now done “exactly the right thing.
“They needed to act to restore public confidence in the process. This is absolutely right.”
The controversy broke after I questioned the legitimacy of the independent panel which, under the council’s rules, should have been authorised through the standards committee. It wasn’t. It turned out that a senior officer of the council working with chief executive Mark Lloyd had put together the panel but had not gained the necessary authorisations from the standards committee to do so.