Unfair to Luminus

I SEE that Luminus has again got the bold head of the page (Letters, June 11). I am a tenant of Luminus and read about them with interest, waiting for you to print a positive letter. On the same page were letters headed Gone to the dogs and Ball noise

I SEE that Luminus has again got the bold head of the page (Letters, June 11). I am a tenant of Luminus and read about them with interest, waiting for you to print a positive letter.

On the same page were letters headed "Gone to the dogs" and "Ball noise annoys", which should have been the top of the page in bold.

I know that Luminus is not perfect, but which firm is? I have had at times gone to them to discuss a problem, and they have sorted it. If you are unhappy about anything, you can call them again and try to see if there is another way to solve the problem and, if not totally happy, everybody who is a tenant of Luminus can ask to see Mr Chan Abraham [the chief executive].

You are always acting unfairly against Luminus. Instead of publishing letters from disgruntled tenants, publish a page on the good things that happen in Huntingdon. Why do you love to kick people or firms down instead of building them up? Positive thinking gets things done.


You may also want to watch:


PAUL HOMEWOOD

Queen's Drive

Most Read

Huntingdon

Editor's note: we can print only the letters we receive. From those we select the ones we think will interest readers.

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter
Comments powered by Disqus