I TOTALLY sympathise with what W B Carter says (Letters, June 13), as I have had similar problems with the council over a tree preservation order. In educating myself on the subject of tree preservation, I found the most helpful information in explaining
I TOTALLY sympathise with what W B Carter says (Letters, June 13), as I have had similar problems with the council over a tree preservation order.
In educating myself on the subject of tree preservation, I found the most helpful information in explaining the ins and outs of TPOs was the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's guidance to councils "Tree Preservation Orders: a guide to the law and good practice".
I would be surprised if a formal appeal to the Government Office in Cambridge (Go-East) were unsuccessful if the tree is dying or dangerous. Mr Carter's neighbour's insurance company can and should be involved to assist in such an appeal.
I am sure that the majority of people consider tree conservation important, especially in such a sparsely wooded county as ours. However, this unreasonable, even draconian, misuse of the TPO regulations inevitably discredits both the council and the cause.
You may also want to watch:
P A HULL, Post Street, Godmanchester
- 1 Dr Nik 'over the moon' after pulling off shock Labour victory
- 2 Expect 'honesty and integrity' says new police and crime commissioner
- 3 Dr Nik Johnson elected Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
- 4 Mother pleads for housing 'electrical checks' after losing children in fire
- 5 Slepe Hall Hotel in St Ives has new owners
- 6 Bustling market town that had 64 pubs at one time
- 7 Dismay and concern over plans to build 36-foot railway viaduct
- 8 Election shock: Tories lose overall control of Cambridgeshire County Council
- 9 St Neots East seat announced after nail-biting three recounts
- 10 Men who threatened shop workers with an axe are jailed