Trader continues fight
A ROGUE trader told to pay more than £500,000 for a confiscation order is set to fight the sum at London s Court of Appeal. Jhalman Singh, of Warwick Avenue, Bedford, was sentenced to 100 hours community service in August 2005 after convictions for severa
A ROGUE trader told to pay more than £500,000 for a confiscation order is set to fight the sum at London's Court of Appeal.
Jhalman Singh, of Warwick Avenue, Bedford, was sentenced to 100 hours community service in August 2005 after convictions for several trademark offences.
In May last year, the 53-year-old, who had sold counterfeit goods from his market stalls in St Neots and Bedford, was made the subject of a confiscation order at Luton Crown Court totalling £585,422.63.
He was found by a judge to be "thoroughly dishonest" and his account books were described as "wholly fictitious".
You may also want to watch:
Last week at the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Laws, sitting with Mr Justice Tugendhat and Mrs Justice Cox, said there was no reason to challenge those findings.
However he said that Singh may have a legitimate complaint that the sum of £585,422 took into account sales of genuine clothing as well as the counterfeit goods.
- 1 Woman jailed for knife-point robbery
- 2 'Savage' attack left man without spleen
- 3 Threatening domestic abuser tracked and assaulted ex partner of 10 years
- 4 Delicious dessert shop 'Snik Snax' opens
- 5 7 of the most expensive houses on the market in Cambridgeshire right now
- 6 Huntingdon dealer who stole from vulnerable man is jailed
- 7 Warning to Huntingdon residents about the legal use of e-scooters
- 8 Royal Oak in Hail Weston named as the best pub in Cambridgeshire
- 9 Life sentence for Huntingdon paedophile who abused seven girls
- 10 Homebirths suspended at Hinchingbrooke Hospital due to staff shortages
The case will return to court later this year for a full appeal.
Singh, who traded for 14 years, was found with dozens of counterfeit items of clothing during a raid on his market stall in May 2003, and a second swoop in November 2004, which also took in residential addresses in Bedford.
Lord Justice Laws said there was "no dispute" that Singh had "persistently sold counterfeit goods".