Passage row goes to court
RESIDENTS of a St Ives passage are to launch a High Court challenge in a bid to retain the right to secure the area at night. Neighbours in Cow and Hare Passage, which connects The Broadway and East Street, claim they have been subjected to a string of a
RESIDENTS of a St Ives' passage are to launch a High Court challenge in a bid to retain the right to secure the area at night.
Neighbours in Cow and Hare Passage, which connects The Broadway and East Street, claim they have been subjected to a string of anti-social incidents caused by drunken, and criminal behaviour.
The residents had sought to tackle the late-night problems by closing and locking a gate at one end of the passage - sparking protests from other people who have used the passage for years as a through route to St Ives town centre.
Cambridgeshire County Council sought to make the passage a public right of way, which would in theory prevent residents from blocking the passage without special permission.
The problem came to a head at a public inquiry last month when a planning inspector sided with the council and agreed Cow and Hare Passage should be included on its definitive map of public rights of way.
However, residents are preparing to fight back.
- 1 Pub regulars celebrate life of former landlord who died during pandemic
- 2 Obsessive stalker jailed for posting explicit photographs of his former partner
- 3 Recap: Thameslink passengers urged to delay travel due to 'incidents'
- 4 Rocks thrown at St Neots school building in vandal attack
- 5 Dry weather continues to impact district as pond drys up in Ramsey
- 6 Product sold at Tesco recalled due to risk of disease-causing bacteria
- 7 Number of bird flu cases have been confirmed in Huntingdonshire
- 8 Fun in the sun at Huntingdon Carnival 2022
- 9 Riverside Miniature Railway raises flag in record breaking year
- 10 Permanent Friday home for HCCN group
Tony Webster, one of the principal objectors who owns a number of properties in the passage, has confirmed there will be an appeal against the inspector's decision.
He said making the passage a public right of way infringed the residents' human rights.
The inspector said rights conferred under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were tempered by the necessity to consider the rights of others, in this case the public's right to continued enjoyment of a highway.
Mr Webster added it was unfortunate more money had to be spent on an appeal but the situation had left them no choice. He said the council could not guarantee a traffic regulation order would be made and that could leave residents without any safety measures at night.
"If the council could guarantee a TRO then we would not be forced to take this course of action," added Mr Webster.