HUNTINGDONSHIRE’S leading gliding club would have to close if four additional wind turbines are given planning consent in Ramsey.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The 93-metre span turbines near Tesco in Ramsey would be less than four kilometres from the Nene Valley Gliding Club’s base at Upwood, and would put pilots in mortal danger from turbulence, the club’s deputy chairman, Peter Valentine, told The Hunts Post on Tuesday.

“We fear that we would have dead pilots on our airfield,” the retired aeronautical engineer said. “We could not risk that, so it would mean closing the airfield.”

The problem, Mr Valentine explained, is the unknown cumulative effect of four turbines operating simultaneously.

“A single turbine slows the wind by 60-70 per cent, and the air tries to speed up to the speed of the wind that has not been affected by the blade, so it’s very turbulent and unpredictable, particularly for pilots of light aircraft, such as gliders, because you can suddenly lose lift on one side and fall into a spin.

“To recover from a spin takes a few hundred feet [of altitude], which you haven’t got when you are landing.”

Mr Valentine says the Civil Aviation Authorities guidance is that wind turbine should not be permitted within eight km of an airfield, and he is urging Huntingdonshire District Council’s planners to refuse the application.

Turbulence behind a single turbine extends for at least 20 times the diameter of the blades, he explains, probably compounded in a group of turbines, so a factor of 30 would be more appropriate, he calculates.

And he believes there is another plan, yet to be submitted, for two more turbines even closer to the Upwood airfield.

“We have already had reports from more than one of our pilots about loss of lift and some instability as a result of the single turbine already placed very near to this new proposed development, and we believe that one landing in a field between that turbine and our runway was caused by the turbine rotor turbulence, fortunately without damage or personal injury.

“With a further four turbines this could well result in a serious accident,” he has told planners.

A further risk is that of a tow-line breaking before a glider is release by the tug aircraft, when the powered plane must turn right and the glider left – potentially into the path of the turbine blades.

“We are probably the best club in this area and the only one with a significant proportion of young and trainee pilots. We are hoping to start a flying scholarship scheme, but we feel very threatened by these windmills.”

Mr Valentine was expecting to explain the aerodynamics and the gliding club’s fears to planning officers from HDC at the airfield last Thursday.

1 comment

  • I find this hard to believe. I looked through the CAA policy on wind turbines. I can’t see anything about wind turbines not being permitted within 8km of an airfield which doesn’t surprise me since many are built very close to aerodromes, East Midlands Airport even has 2 within the airport boundary. They do say turbulence can extend 16 rotor diameters downwind, well short of Upwood and even this does not mean it is actually a problem. The furthest distance I could find on the internet for actual measurements of turbulence was about 24 rotor diameters, still well short of Upwood, at which distance the turbulence was lost in normal background. I would think a glider pilot who could not cope with levels of turbulence so small should not be a glider pilot.

    Report this comment

    Barbel

    Monday, October 8, 2012

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Weddingsite

Click here to read more of our digital publications
Wedding Show Retailers List Reader Holidays Paper delivery enquiries

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT