ALLEGATIONS made by a former employee about ill-treatment of dogs on a farm in Wyton where beagles are bred for medical research were shown to be baseless, the firm said yesterday (Tuesday).

To send a link to this page to a friend, simply enter their email address below.

The message will include the name and email address you gave us when you signed up.

 

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

The Sunday Times of July 10 quoted Russell Trigg, 30, who had worked at Harlan Laboratories’ facility in Sawtry Way as an animal care technician as complaining that dogs were confined in small pens, had little exercise or intimate human contact, and were sometimes mis-treated.

Companies such as Harlan – and Huntingdon Life Sciences at Woolley – are between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, they play a vital part in the testing of life-saving new medicines, which must by law be tested on animals before humans can take them.

On the other, they are the implacable targets of animal rights extremists who, until HLS was granted various injunctions by the High Court, routinely attacked premises, property and sometimes employees of the company and its suppliers.

So, when contacted by the Sunday Times, Harlan had a choice: stay under the radar and let the allegations develop their own momentum or invite the paper to see for itself. The latter choice seems so far to have paid off.

A company spokesman said: “The impetus for the article was some disturbing and untrue allegations that were made to The Sunday Times by a former Harlan employee who trained with us in our Wyton facility for a very short time, over a year ago.

“The reporter took us up on our invitation to visit Wyton and to see for himself the high standards of care that we assure for our animals.

“As he toured the facility and met many of our staff personally, he saw a committed workforce – devoted to the care of our animals – acquitting themselves professionally and compassionately.

“He was able to observe groups of active dogs with wagging tails, healthy puppies, clean housing, multiple play areas and enrichments for the animals, fresh and healthy food … in short, the exact opposite of what he had been told.”

Harlan UK’s operations director, who asked not to be identified because of the animal rights sensitivity, said the reaction from the scientific community and from clients since publication of the report had been “very supportive” of Harlan.

The company added: “We are extremely proud of each and every one of our Harlan employees – particularly those at our Wyton site – who played a role in helping us demonstrate to The Sunday Times our ongoing commitment for meeting our animal welfare obligations. We were professional, appropriately transparent, and respectful in all of our interactions and exchanges with The Sunday Times in advance of their article.

“We will continue to work with The Sunday Times and others to ensure that the facts of the important work that is done by Harlan and others in our industry – and how that work is done with the highest standards of quality and care – are clearly and accurately represented.

“We cannot control what others will say about the work that we do. But we can control what we do, and how we do it. We will continue to set our standards high, and will appropriately tell of and stand behind our important work with the fullest confidence.”

Latest News See all

1 comments

  • Firstly I would like to say how nieve it is to assume that when you are personally invited to look around, that the staff wouldn't be making a special effort because you are there! Of course they aren't going to leave the animals in squaller when they have invited a journalist around. Secondly, i find it rather annoying that the media only mention mediacl experiments. Do Harlan only sell to medical experiments, I think not, they are a business selling to labs to make money and will not be given any details at all of what experiments these animals will be used in. The 'medicines' argument is always used to try and win support from the confused public. What about the weed killer, household products, food colourings, paint, these are all tested on animals plus so much more, and last time i looked these were not 'life saving drugs'. Thirdly, when you actually research animal experiments from an unbiased point of view, i.e not just accepting the opinion of one who makes money out of vivisection, there is a lot of evidence to suggest that they don't work, that drugs get onto the market, harm or even kill people and are then removed, that part is often hushed up. Billions of pounds, billions of animals lives and decades of research have still not found cures for the top 3 killer diseases, incidently the fourth biggest killer of humans is the side effects from so called 'safe' drugs. Who knows, if we actually opened our eyes and started focusing on research actually based on humans and not an entirely different species, we may by now have cured cancer.

    Report this comment

    Kathy James

    Tuesday, July 19, 2011



Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
Jumbo24
MyMoney24MyVouchers24

Click here to read more of our digital publications
Hunts Post Business Awards Hunts Sports Awards Wedding Fayres Reader Holidays